Excellent medical facilities, low crime, good educational institutions, decent air quality and solid infrastructure have contributed to Bern and Copenhagen topping our global rankings for quality of living for European assignees.”
Updated annually, ECA's Location Ratings system objectively evaluates a host of factors to form an assessment of the overall quality of living in over 470 locations worldwide. The system helps companies establish appropriate allowances to compensate employees for the adjustment required when going on international assignment. Factors assessed include climate; availability of health services; housing and utilities; isolation; access to a social network and leisure facilities; infrastructure; personal safety; political tensions; and air quality.
The impact of some of the factors assessed will vary according to where someone comes from.
“The significance of some of the factors assessed, such as distance from home and differences in culture, language and climate, will vary according to where someone originates from,” explained Ashman. “For this reason, our analysis considers both the home and destination countries. So, while Copenhagen and Bern rank at the top for Europeans they fall to ninth and 13th respectively for someone coming from Asia. For Asian expatriates, Singapore is the most liveable location. It ranks 95th globally from the perspective of a European assignee.”
Cities in Belgium, Germany and France have all declined in the global rankings this year. Berlin has fallen by two positions to 22nd, Brussels has dropped by three places to 25th, and Paris is down four places to 36th. Marseille is the European city with the most significant decline in the global rankings this year, falling by eight places to 74th position.
“Terrorist attacks seen in Western Europe in late 2015 and throughout 2016 have elevated the Socio-political tensions scoring for cities in Belgium, Germany and France this year. This higher scoring reflects the greater threat currently posed to assignees in these locations,” said Ashman.
Other Swiss and Dutch cities continue to dominate the global top 10 rankings, with The Hague in third, Geneva in fourth and Basel in sixth; Amsterdam and Eindhoven occupy joint seventh place.
London continues to sit in 47th position globally. It is ranked below several other UK cities in the global liveability rankings, with Edinburgh and Cardiff coming in at 20th and 28th positions respectively.
“London scores somewhat higher than other locations in the UK on air pollution and crime, as one would expect from a very large city. But the scores are still relatively low in the larger scheme of things and so a Western European expatriate would not require a location allowance for an assignment to London,” said Ashman.
Tirana, Albania, has seen the most substantial improvement in its scoring out of all ranked European cities over a five-year period. Substantial upgrades to infrastructure and educational facilities have meant that it has risen by 11 places in the global rankings from 2013 to 2017.
Kiev, Ukraine, is on the opposite side of the scale. Over a five-year period, its overall liveability continues to be damaged by the ongoing conflict in Eastern Ukraine. It has led to a significantly heightened Socio-political tensions scoring over this period.
Chisinau, Moldova, ranked 193rd, is Europe’s least liveable city.
Global top 20 - Most liveable locations for European expats
|2017 rank||2016 rank||2013 rank|
In North America, Toronto (28th) is the most liveable location followed by Vancouver (33rd). While in Latin America, Chile's Santiago (110th) scores most favourably for European assignees, followed by the Uruguayan capital, Montevideo (113th).
Canberra is the best scoring location in Australia (44th globally), followed by Adelaide (49th). Wellington, in 39th place, is the most liveable location in New Zealand surveyed.
Singapore (95th globally), is the Asian city that offers the best quality of living for European assignees, followed by the Japanese city of Osaka (97th). Beijing (141st) and New Delhi (210th) have the worst score for air quality globally.
Tel Aviv (108th globally) is the location in the Middle East which requires the least adjustment for European assignees overall, followed by Dubai (116th).
For European assignees going to Africa, Port Louis, Mauritius (115th), affords the best quality of living, followed by Cape Town (117th).
Globally, the hardest locations to adapt to living and working in for a European expatriate are the Afghan locations of Lashkar Gah and Kandahar.
About ECA's Location Ratings
Standard allowance calculations:
Updated annually, ECA International's Location Ratings System measures the quality of expatriate living conditions in over 470 locations around the world to arrive at a fair and consistent assessment of the level of difficulty the expatriate will experience in adapting to a new location. Factors evaluated include climate; availability of health services; housing and utilities; isolation; access to a social network and leisure facilities; infrastructure; personal safety; political tensions and air quality.
Follow ECA on twitter: @ECAintl
Latest from iexpatriate.com
- Saudi Expatriate Fees Causes 'Panic’ And Computer Glitches
- Expatriates And Foreign Nationals Working In India May Have To Obtain Aadhaar Number By 31 July 2017
- Greater Mobility Of Expatriate Workers In The Economy Would Help Close Wage Gap Between Saudi Nationals And Expatriates
- Hong Kong Expatriate Pay And Benefits Packages Hit Five-Year Low
- Singapore Offers Some Of The Most Generous Expatriate Salary And Benefits Packages In Asia Pacific